- From: Adam Roach <abr@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:10:14 -0500
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, public-webrtc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5620F736.7020906@mozilla.com>
On 10/16/15 02:52, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > And this is not because there are no issues; picking out a random > topic from discussion: > We still don't have a defined interpretation for > > m=video .... 117 > a=imageattr:117 send [x=40:180 y=40:180] > a=simulcast: send rid=11;12 > a=rid:11 send pt=117 max-width=80 > a=rid:12 send pt=117 max-width=200 > > (that is - if rid and imageattr with pt apply to the same stream, do > they both apply, or does one override the other? If they conflict, is > the stream invalid and should be rejected?) Can you raise a specific objection with the explanation about how this is currently described? https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pthatcher-mmusic-rid-01#section-9 > And the RID draft still doesn't reference a definition of a bitrate > for the (extremely useful) "max-br" field; given the time we've spent > on bitrate definitions in the past, this is not encouraging. Can you raise a specific objection with how this is currently defined? https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pthatcher-mmusic-rid-01#section-6 -- Adam Roach Principal Platform Engineer abr@mozilla.com +1 650 903 0800 x863
Received on Friday, 16 October 2015 13:10:46 UTC