W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > October 2015

Re: Towards Simulcast

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:34:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUFMgcQ8EuwEMOSLVGiyNvW1wRT5GooKe4QzoT9u5xjY0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, Adam Roach <abr@mozilla.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Yes, it would help.  It would help even more if you included the part about
timeframe of doing so being at IETF 94 and that if we can't, then this is
out of WebRTC 1.0.  Perhaps "At IETF 94, either we all agree on the way to
move forward and it seems likely that we can complete the needed work in
3-6 months, or it's not going to be part of WebRTC 1.0."





On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 10/15/15 7:43 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
>
>> While I agree that RID + Plan X would qualify as a workable solution, I
>> think we need to be more clear about where the RID draft needs to be for
>> WebRTC 1.0 to depend on it.  Saying "on a trajectory to finish in 6 months"
>> is too vague and too long away.
>>
>
> Would it help if I rephrased it as "we all agree this is the way to move
> forward and it seems likely that we can complete the needed work in 3-6
> months" ?
>
> /a
>
Received on Friday, 16 October 2015 04:35:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:46 UTC