- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:36:48 +0100
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <564B73C0.2020504@alvestrand.no>
It was suggested to me that since this document deals with some IP address access issues, it should also have attention called to it on the WebRTC list. Here you are... -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Formalizing our permissions model using the Permissions API Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:41:28 +0000 Resent-From: public-media-capture@w3.org Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:40:55 +0100 From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> To: public-media-capture@w3.org <public-media-capture@w3.org> I tried to think a bit about how I would formalize the permissions model we have designed for WebRTC in terms of the permissions API's permissions model. After a while, it seemed to make sense, and I'd like to share it to see if it makes sense to others. The Google doc is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13c4hTlm2XgVYpxfGL1a8fcvI1CAUdIgd662DfElk_ow/edit#heading=h.fb7kn49jp9ff Anyone with the link should be able to comment, if you want to comment off-list. The content is attached as PDF, which may be more accessible to some (and is certainly more archivable). Questions to ask: - Is this something worth doing? - If yes: Is this something that should be part of our core docs, a separate doc, part of the permissions doc, or in some "other" category? - Where did I go wrong? Comments welcome! Harald
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: WebRTCPermissions.pdf
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2015 18:37:21 UTC