Re: REMINDER: Doodle: Face to Face meeting in September 2015

IETF80 EU
IETF81 EC
IETF82 AS
TPAC11 WC
INT82.5 WC
IETF83 EU
INT83.5 EU
IETF84 WC
IETF84.5 EU
TPAC12 EU
IETF85 EC
INT85.5 EC
IETF86 EC
IETF87 EU
IETF88 WC
TPAC13 AS
IETF89 EU
IETF90 EC
TPAC14 WC
IETF91 AS
IETF92 EC
IETF93 EU
webrtc XX
TPAC15 AS
IETF94 AS
IETF95 EU
IETF96 EU
IETF97 AS
IETF98 WC
IETF99 EU


On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

>  On 05/20/2015 12:47 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> Harald,
>
>  I thought we had agreed to try to balance the meetings between West
> Coast US,
> East Coast US, and Europe. If you look at the schedule after IETF 93, I
> believe
> we will have had the following meeting distribution:
>
>  IETF93 {'EU': 8, 'NONE': 999, 'WC': 5, 'AS': 3, 'EC': 6}
>
>  This suggests that the next meeting should be West Coast, or failing that
> East Coast, not Europe.
>
>
> Hm. I must admit to not having done the count - and to not having the list
> handy.
> None of the recent interims and TPACs (post Lyon) have been in Europe, but
> we will have had two IETFs in Europe (London and Prague) before this
> interim.
>
> Can you send me the list of meetings you're using?
>
>
>  -Ekr
>
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
> wrote:
>
>> Reminder:
>>
>> We'll look at this doodle on Friday, and try to draw a conclusion.
>> Please reply to the doodle - ESPECIALLY if your answer is "won't make it
>> at any of the times suggested".
>>
>> Den 12. mai 2015 15:14, skrev Harald Alvestrand:
>> > Another Doodle, this time to choose between possible times for a
>> > face-to-face in September.
>> >
>> > Given the location of the last few meetings, we think Europe is a
>> > reasonable choice this time, but we don't have a place yet.
>> > Well connected is important, of course.
>> >
>> > Doodle is here:
>> >
>> > http://doodle.com/8nqcbnd7ebv4nfau
>> >
>> > NOTE: We cancelled the IETF-associated meeting because the doodle showed
>> > that we did not have a critical mass of contributors (and a significant
>> > number of people said they would choose not to come).
>> >
>> > When interpreting this doodle, we'll use the same thinking: If we don't
>> > have enough people to make it worth showing up, we won't schedule a
>> meeting.
>> >
>> > Decision time can be assumed to be end of next week: May 22, 2015, 23:59
>> > UTC. (We'll probably make a decision somewhat later, but it's safe to
>> > assume that if you're entered on the poll at this time, your opinion
>> > will be considered!)
>> >
>> > Harald, for the chairs
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
>