Re: Data Channel Buffer Management Proposal

Are you advocating for an event every time bufferedAmount decreases, or an
event when bufferedAmount crosses some (constant or configurable) threshold?

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 18 May 2015 at 11:43, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote:
> > Promise<void> waitForBufferedAmountBelow (unsigned long amount);
> >
> > This method returns a Promise that resolves when this.bufferedAmount <=
> > amount, or rejects if the channel reaches the "closed" state.
>
> I think that this requires strictly more state on the browser than an
> event.  Since the function can be invoked multiple times with
> different thresholds, the browser has to track a set of thresholds.
>
> I'd prefer an event.
>