Are you advocating for an event every time bufferedAmount decreases, or an event when bufferedAmount crosses some (constant or configurable) threshold? On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 May 2015 at 11:43, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote: > > Promise<void> waitForBufferedAmountBelow (unsigned long amount); > > > > This method returns a Promise that resolves when this.bufferedAmount <= > > amount, or rejects if the channel reaches the "closed" state. > > I think that this requires strictly more state on the browser than an > event. Since the function can be invoked multiple times with > different thresholds, the browser has to track a set of thresholds. > > I'd prefer an event. >Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2015 17:17:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:06 UTC