> On 18 Mar 2015, at 13:47, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > > On 03/18/2015 11:57 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >> On 18/03/15 11:38, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> >>> It would surprise me if WEBRTC is the only area where people use >>> Json.stringify on DOM objects, so I'm waiting to see what the West Coast >>> folks say when they wake up. >>> >>> It's possible that the right solution is to modify Json.stringify() to >>> work in harmony with the new definitions, in which case we don't need to >>> do anything. >> We use specific WebIDL serializers [1] on these objects that specifies >> that all attributes should be included in the serialization so I think >> it's covered in the spec. > > Thanks - I'm kicking this back to our WebRTC people to figure out if the appropriate solution is to implement the serializers in Chrome. > > That's what we have canaries for…. tweet,tweet,thud. :-)Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2015 14:25:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:04 UTC