> On 18 Mar 2015, at 13:47, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>
> On 03/18/2015 11:57 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote:
>> On 18/03/15 11:38, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>>
>>> It would surprise me if WEBRTC is the only area where people use
>>> Json.stringify on DOM objects, so I'm waiting to see what the West Coast
>>> folks say when they wake up.
>>>
>>> It's possible that the right solution is to modify Json.stringify() to
>>> work in harmony with the new definitions, in which case we don't need to
>>> do anything.
>> We use specific WebIDL serializers [1] on these objects that specifies
>> that all attributes should be included in the serialization so I think
>> it's covered in the spec.
>
> Thanks - I'm kicking this back to our WebRTC people to figure out if the appropriate solution is to implement the serializers in Chrome.
>
> That's what we have canaries for….
tweet,tweet,thud.
:-)