Re: Next steps on PRs

Thanks. Here's the currently remaining PRs from my original list of small
PRs:

   - #197 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/197> - ORTC attribution
   - #193  <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/193>- .mid property
   - #192 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/192> - RTCIceServer
   support for auth tokens
   - #185 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/185> - rename of updateIce
   - #171 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/171> - add RTCAsnwerOptions


On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com
> wrote:

> Yes. I'll merge Dom's fix as soon as Travis is done checking it.
>
> /Adam
>
> On 10/03/15 23:18, Justin Uberti wrote:
> > Thanks! Seems one of the merges might have gone awry - travis is failing.
> >
> > https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/201
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Adam Bergkvist
> > <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com <mailto:adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >     On 10/03/15 01:32, Justin Uberti wrote:
> >     > Now that we've landed the big RtpSender and onNN PRs, the
> following PRs
> >     > look positively tiny in comparison. Would folks be in favor of a
> short
> >     > call this week where we could review these together and try to get
> them
> >     > squared away?
> >     >
> >      >   * #200 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/200>-
> >      >     onsignalingstatechange update
> >      >   * #197 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/197> - ORTC
> >     attribution
> >      >   * #193 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/193>- .mid
> property
> >      >   * #192 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/192> -
> RTCIceServer
> >      >     support for auth tokens
> >      >   * #185 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/185> - rename of
> >     updateIce
> >      >   * #184 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/184> - fix
> >     identity typo
> >      >   * #171 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/171> - add
> >     RTCAsnwerOptions
> >      >   * #167 <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/167> - move DTMF
> >     sender
> >     >     to RTP sender
> >     >
> >     > There are 10 others queued up as well, but if we could nail the
> easy
> >     > ones quickly we could focus our attention on the thorny ones.
> >
> >     I've merged #167 and #200 just now.
> >
> >     /Adam
> >
> >
>
>