W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2015

Re: PR for adding RtpSender.transport, RtpReceiver.transport, RTCDtlsTransport, RTCIceTransport, etc

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:27:07 +0200
Message-ID: <558A5BCB.4060105@alvestrand.no>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 06/23/2015 10:38 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
> Does DtlsTransport really have a "disconnected"/retrying state?  I
> guess we could make it "disconnected" any time the underlying
> IceTransport is disconnected, but that adds complexity.  What value do
> we gain to make it worthwhile?

I don't know DTLS well enough to say..... I'm sure there are states
where the ICE connection is working fine, but traffic isn't getting
through because something's wrong at the DTLS layer - it would be
important to clearly identify that we're in that state.

Otherwise, the fewer states the better.
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2015 07:28:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:44 UTC