W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2015

Re: Naming conventions (Re: PR for adding RtpSender.transport)

From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 15:05:11 +0000
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
CC: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <331CE186-3046-47E3-859E-266FB4630A9A@microsoft.com>
On Jun 21, 2015, at 1:30 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> So far, the WebRTC spec has mostly followed the Blink convention (RTC).
> Switching to the Google convention would be a major hassle, even though
> I find it more readable a lot of the time.

[BA] With respect to objects, the WebRTC spec mostly uses Google convention (e.g. It is RTCRtpSender/RTCRtpReceiver, not RTCRTPSender/RTCRTPReceiver). 

> Note: RTCDtmfSender, being a mixture, is not defensible under any of the
> conventions.

[BA] Then neither is RTCRtpSender/RTCRtpReceiver.
Received on Sunday, 21 June 2015 15:05:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:44 UTC