Fwd: [rtcweb] Updated WG Last call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> · Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 10:56:06 +1000

Forwarding this from the IETF, because I am unclear what effect a ICE
update has on a Web application.

Would the UA take care of ICE updates or would that get exposed on the
API level?
Would the RTCPeerConnection be pulled down when consent expires and
need to be re-established?
How can we deal with ICE updates without killing an existing video connection?

Thanks,
Silvia.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM
Subject: [rtcweb] Updated WG Last call for
draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper
<alissa@cooperw.in>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Sean Turner
<turners@ieca.com>

The -14 of this draft is out now, with updates related to several of
the external reviews.  Please re-review the document by June 29, 2015
and provide comments.  Below is a link for your convenience,

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness/

regards,

Ted, Cullen, Sean

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb