RE: I have created a PR for RtpSender.getCapabilities and RtpReceiver.getCapabilities from Bernard Aboba on 2015-07-20 (public-webrtc@w3.org from July 2015)

From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:15:17 +0000
To: Luis López Fernández <luis.lopez@urjc.es>, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB14921B7A7F736804CCEDF83EC850@BLUPR03MB149.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

Also agree - which is why we used MIME types in ORTC.
________________________________
From: Luis López Fernández<mailto:luis.lopez@urjc.es>
Sent: ‎7/‎20/‎2015 12:21 PM
To: Silvia Pfeiffer<mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Shpount<mailto:roman@telurix.com>; public-webrtc<mailto:public-webrtc@w3.org>; Peter Thatcher<mailto:pthatcher@google.com>
Subject: Re: I have created a PR for RtpSender.getCapabilities and RtpReceiver.getCapabilities

+1, fully agree.

One piece of warning: duplicate information like this can lead to conflicting information orifices in the two fields. I would prefer to just use mime types as defined by IANA:http://www.iana.org/assignments/rtp-parameters/rtp-parameters.xhtml. note that these are the rtp mime types, not the file mime types, which is more appropriate for WebRTC imho.

Received on Monday, 20 July 2015 14:15:51 UTC