Re: Suggestion made during AC review of charter

+1 likely makes more sense for it to be in the wiki than the charter.

On Saturday, July 18, 2015, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> On 07/17/2015 11:09 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > On 17 July 2015 at 12:02, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> Because I'm reluctant to bring non-absolutely required changes to the
> >> charter at this point, I'll likely recommend to the Director we abstain
> from
> >> adding it to ours this time around; but I'm submitting it to the group
> who
> >> might choose to adopt as its own nevertheless, independently of its
> charter.
> >> I'll leave it to the chairs to determine if and how that policy should
> be
> >> adopted.
> > I think that this is a change worth having, despite the churn.
> >
>
> I think the rule makes sense, but it's not obvious to me that it won't
> need tweaking over time - and tweaking stuff that's in the charter is a
> heavy-duty process.
>
> My thought is that we can add it to the WG wiki, and follow it.
>
>
> --
> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
>
>

-- 
*Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash
<http://hookflash.com/>* | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *