- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:27:16 -0400
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, public-webrtc@w3.org
On 7/15/15 5:03 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> If we plan to fail when an RTCIceCandidate is constructed with a bad >> candidate string, we need to perform the same check every time the >> corresponding attribute is set. > Yep. Which argues that the RTCIceCandidate should either be immutable or > allow syntactically invalid candidates. > > Otherwise, this will work: > > c.candidate = part1 + ' ' + part2 > > but this will not work > > c.candidate = part1 > c.candidate += ' ' > c.candidate += part2 > > Violates the principle of least surprise. Good point. Not to advocate change, but just for info, what was the rationale for RTCIceCandidate not just being a dictionary? .: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2015 15:27:49 UTC