- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:13:56 -0800
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 15 January 2015 at 12:55, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > That's the danger of putting names in a charter. We'll get to that when > we come to it (but if the editors wish to suggest a name change now, > that would be nice to have done). "Media Capture from HTML elements", maybe. I just wanted to avoid the obvious over-constraint. It's only potentially incorrect, we're not that far done yet. >> I don't think that the WebRTC milestones are realistic. > > Which of them? All, or just some? Specifically webrtc-pc (I didn't see the obvious confusion there, sorry). This is a very large piece of work and I don't see it as being at the same level of maturity as gUM. It has similar dates to gUM, and it is much bigger and complex, and it has nasty external depedencies.
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 23:14:26 UTC