On 9 January 2015 at 14:33, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote: > This is a non practical design. What about all those JavaScript async > loaders (AMD, requireJS) etc? Those loaders execute code in callbacks > so gUM wouldn't work. What about if the JS app needs to wait until the > DOM is loaded before calling gUM? Writing the <script> tag that calls > gUM on the bottom of the <body> is just an old-fashion workaround. I don't understand the minutiae here, but I understand that certain asynchronous actions preserve the engagement gesture status.Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 23:14:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:42 UTC