- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:13:55 -0800
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 9 January 2015 at 14:33, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote: > This is a non practical design. What about all those JavaScript async > loaders (AMD, requireJS) etc? Those loaders execute code in callbacks > so gUM wouldn't work. What about if the JS app needs to wait until the > DOM is loaded before calling gUM? Writing the <script> tag that calls > gUM on the bottom of the <body> is just an old-fashion workaround. I don't understand the minutiae here, but I understand that certain asynchronous actions preserve the engagement gesture status.
Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 23:14:22 UTC