Hi Michael, > On 06 Jan 2015, at 14:32, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > > On 06 Jan 2015, at 07:13, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > >> Den 06. jan. 2015 00:14, skrev Singh Varun: >>> Hi Harald, >>> >>> Response inline. [Snip!] >>>> >>>> There are no values for the datachannel stats. >>>> >>>> To make this symmetric with RTP, I suggest we add "inbounddata" and "outbounddata". >>>> >>> I presume that the stats currently in RTCDataChannelStats will then be split to inbound and outbound? >> >> >> On second consideration, that doesn't make sense. The reason RTP is >> split is that RTP is unidirectional, while datachannel is bidirectional. >> >> Second proposal: >> The string should be "datachannel". No split. > Are there counters needed for abandoned messages? Should these counters > be different for messages which have never been sent or for which at least > one part was sent once? > Are these metrics (abandoned message, etc.) defined somewhere? It would be easier to include them if we can just point to a definition in some existing standards document. > Best regards > Michael >> >> >>> >>> dictionary RTCDataChannelStats : RTCStats { >>> DOMString label; >>> DOMString protocol; >>> long datachannelid; >>> RTCDataChannelState state; >>> }; >>> >>> dictionary ourbounddata: RTCDataChannelStats { >>> unsigned long messagesSent; >>> unsigned long long bytesSent; >>> } >>> >>> dictionary inbounddata: RTCDataChannelStats { >>> unsigned long messagesReceived; >>> unsigned long long bytesReceived; >>> } >>> >>> — >>> http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun — http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varunReceived on Tuesday, 6 January 2015 13:01:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:03 UTC