W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > February 2015

Re: Specify the negotiationneeded event

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:58:42 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXt4aBJKzRvD6b0_xQ4HLeL5T9-HdXYGxRVd86wCC_tvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
That is a good way of describing it.

On 13 February 2015 at 11:24, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> For simplicity, 'dirty' is not cleared by any other operations, such as
> addTrack(X) followed by removeTrack(X). We should accept that it is far
> better to fire too many onNN events than too few; spurious onNNs are
> essentially harmless, whereas missing onNNs may be fatal.

I'll note that, as you describe it, you won't be generating many onNN
events at all, in fact, fewer than might otherwise be generated due to
on-off-on-again actions like addTrack and removeTrack in series.
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 23:59:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:43 UTC