Tuesday, 29 December 2015
- Re: Constraints and Encoding Parameters
- Re: Constraints and Encoding Parameters
- Re: Constraints and Encoding Parameters
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Make DataChannels Transferable and explain the implications
Monday, 28 December 2015
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add languages on how to choose IP addresses.
- Re: Constraints and Encoding Parameters
Thursday, 24 December 2015
Tuesday, 22 December 2015
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Impossible to know if ICE agent is "finished checking", for "failed" and "completed" states.
- New webrtc-pc Editor's draft (v20151222)
- Re: Constraints and Encoding Parameters
Monday, 21 December 2015
Friday, 18 December 2015
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Impossible to know if ICE agent is "finished checking", for "failed" and "completed" states.
- Re: Issue 440: Use interfaces not dictionaries
Thursday, 17 December 2015
- RE: [webrtc-pc] Impossible to know if ICE agent is "finished checking", for "failed" and "completed" states.
- [webrtc-pc] Impossible to know if ICE agent is "finished checking", for "failed" and "completed" states.
- RE: Closed: [webrtc-pc] Need to add public to RTCIceTransports
- [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransports needs to be DOMString not enum?
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Need to add public to RTCIceTransports
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] getRemoteCertificates() should return a sequence of base64 DOMString instead of sequence <ArrayBuffer>
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] `getRemoteCertificates()` is ill-defined
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] No closed state check in RTCPeerConnection.setConfiguration()
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Check for closed state in setConfiguration() (fixes #436)
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Clarification for getRemoteCertificates()
- RE: Issue 440: Use interfaces not dictionaries
- Re: W3C WebRTC WG Virtual Face to Face - 14 out of 75+ participants?
- Re: W3C WebRTC WG Virtual Face to Face - 14 out of 75+ participants?
- RE: W3C WebRTC WG Virtual Face to Face - 14 out of 75+ participants?
- [webrtc-pc] Use interfaces not dictionaries
- W3C WebRTC WG Virtual Face to Face - 14 out of 75+ participants?
Wednesday, 16 December 2015
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpSender section doesn't include the definition for RTCRtpSender
- RE: Closed: [webrtc-pc] should "none" be a recognized value in RTCIceTransportPolicy?
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] should "none" be a recognized value in RTCIceTransportPolicy?
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] is `audioLevel` in `RTCRtpContributingSource` positive or negative?
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] "none" as a RTCIceCredentialType
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCBundlePolicy Enum section should not be non-normative
- RE: Consensus call: MaxFramerate for RTCRtpEncodingParameters
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Complete security considerations based on security questionnaire and IP address discussions
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Remove mid from sender/receiver
- [webrtc-pc] How should replaceTrack() behave with an "unused" sender
Tuesday, 15 December 2015
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Refer to definition of networking task source
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Check for closed state in setConfiguration() (fixes #436)
- [webrtc-pc] No closed state check in RTCPeerConnection.setConfiguration()
- Constraints and Encoding Parameters
Monday, 14 December 2015
Sunday, 13 December 2015
- Re: New style for W3C Technical Report
- Re: New style for W3C Technical Report
- Re: New style for W3C Technical Report
Saturday, 12 December 2015
- Re: Doodle for Virtual Face-to-Face
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Any reason not to use sequence<> in RTCTrackEvent?
Friday, 11 December 2015
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Any reason not to use sequence<> in RTCTrackEvent?
- [webrtc-pc] Any reason not to use sequence<> in RTCTrackEvent?
- Re: WG Github + Mailing List
- Re: WG Github + Mailing List
- Re: WG Github + Mailing List
- Re: Strange warning
Thursday, 10 December 2015
- Re: Strange warning
- Re: Strange warning
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Change setParameters call to be Async
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Ambiguous type of `ssrc` identifier; DOMString or unsigned long?
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCSessionDescription should not allow nullable sdp
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] STUN checks via TURN servers really should not have peer-reflexive priority (and should have unique priority as well)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Use unsigned long ssrc in stats
- New style for W3C Technical Report
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update RTCIceTransportPolicy
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarification for getRemoteCertificates()
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Issue 412: Framerate knob for simulcast
Wednesday, 9 December 2015
- Re: setting generated key expire time.
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Adding expires attribute to generateCertificate.
- RE: Issue 391: Remove DTMF tones A-D
- Re: Issue 391: Remove DTMF tones A-D
- Re: Issue 391: Remove DTMF tones A-D
- Re: Issue 391: Remove DTMF tones A-D
- Doodle for Virtual Face-to-Face
- RE: Issue 412: Framerate knob for simulcast
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Don't create a default stream in 'dispatch a receiver' steps
- setting generated key expire time.
- Re: Issue 412: Framerate knob for simulcast
- [webrtc-pc] No reference to where TypeError is defined
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Not clear when responding PeerConnection reaches iceconnectionstate = completed
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Why throw on empty iceServers list?
- RE: API for browser to provide TURN servers
- Re: Issue 412: Framerate knob for simulcast
- RE: Issue 412: Framerate knob for simulcast
- Re: Issue 412: Framerate knob for simulcast
- Re: Issue 412: Framerate knob for simulcast
Tuesday, 8 December 2015
- Re: API for browser to provide TURN servers
- Re: API for browser to provide TURN servers
- WG Github + Mailing List
- Re: API for browser to provide TURN servers
- Re: API for browser to provide TURN servers
- Re: API for browser to provide TURN servers
- API for browser to provide TURN servers
Monday, 7 December 2015
Sunday, 6 December 2015
Saturday, 5 December 2015
Thursday, 3 December 2015
- Re: Issue 391: Remove DTMF tones A-D
- Re: Issue 391: Remove DTMF tones A-D
- Re: Issue 391: Remove DTMF tones A-D
- Re: Issue 384: should "none" be a recognized value in RTCIceTransportPolicy?
Wednesday, 2 December 2015
- Re: impact of bundle and retch-mux on the number of Transports
- Re: impact of bundle and retch-mux on the number of Transports
- Re: impact of bundle and retch-mux on the number of Transports
Tuesday, 1 December 2015
- Re: RTCPeerConnection permissions
- Re: Issue 391: Remove DTMF tones A-D
- Re: Issue 391: Remove DTMF tones A-D
- Re: RTCPeerConnection permissions
- Re: RTCPeerConnection permissions