W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Naming question to resolve: state vs. readystate vs connectionstate

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:27:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUHMJMpfu8_CEponcd7Yps0=8cwr0yxvfJ3_FTkLFO5dxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Cc: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
transport.transportState is needlessly verbose.  transport.readyState and
transport.connectionState at least match something somewhere else.
 transport.transportState might as well just be transport.state, since
.transportState doesn't exist anywhere else.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2015-08-25 10:37 GMT+02:00 Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>:
> > IceTransport.connectionState (type: RTCIceConnectionState)
>
> Shouldn't it be RTCIceTransportState?
>
>
> > RTCDtlsTransport.transportState (type: RTCDtlsTransportState)
>
> Otherwise this should be:
>
> RTCDtlsTransport.connectionState (type: RTCDtlsConnectionState)
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
>
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 17:28:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:45 UTC