Re: Naming question to resolve: state vs. readystate vs connectionstate

transport.transportState is needlessly verbose.  transport.readyState and
transport.connectionState at least match something somewhere else.
 transport.transportState might as well just be transport.state, since
.transportState doesn't exist anywhere else.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2015-08-25 10:37 GMT+02:00 Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>:
> > IceTransport.connectionState (type: RTCIceConnectionState)
>
> Shouldn't it be RTCIceTransportState?
>
>
> > RTCDtlsTransport.transportState (type: RTCDtlsTransportState)
>
> Otherwise this should be:
>
> RTCDtlsTransport.connectionState (type: RTCDtlsConnectionState)
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
>