Re: Agenda request: accessors for pending/current descriptions

I believe the rule was that we have to have a PR for things we want in.
That's why I've been making a lot of PRs :).  I think it would be good to
follow our rule in this case.  It would help make the discussion more
concrete.




On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> We seem to be having some trouble converging on which accessors
> we need. See:
>
> https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/issues/16
>
> Can we please have this on the agenda for the interim?
>
> -Ekr
>
>