- From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:00:05 -0700
- To: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJrXDUHygE5OLgQ3m76zA9JBVQhtp3K6DFvVwLMPc6AqXa7txg@mail.gmail.com>
I updated the PR with a TODO to get a definition of bitrate. I think we can merge the PR with the knob with such a TODO. We can, for example, start implementing the knob, even if we have to tweak the meaning later to match a different definition of bitrate. On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK < stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > On 19/07/15 04:44, Randell Jesup wrote: > > On 7/18/2015 6:10 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > >> On 07/18/2015 12:19 AM, Peter Thatcher wrote: > >>> Here's the PR: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/254 > >>> > >>> Here's the diff: > >>> > >>> + > >>> + <dt>unsigned long maxBitrate</dt> > >>> + <dd> > >>> + <p> > >>> + Indicates the maximum bitrate that can used to send this > >>> + encoding. > >>> + </p> > >>> + </dd> > >>> > >>> > >>> Question for the WG: do we have consensus to add this? I'm in > >>> favor of it :). > >> Thanks! > > > > I'm in favor, though I'm not sure this is sufficient. > > > >> Looking through the current spec, there doesn't seem to be any other > >> bitrate limits specified, but we've chatted in the past about having > >> overall bitrate controls (at one point we had bitrate as a constraint > >> on createOffer, I think). > >> > >> Are there other places that need bitrate controls, and if so, how > >> should they interact? > > > > So there are a couple of issues around bitrates, not all equally > important: > > > > * Control of the bitrate (max/min) for a specific stream > > * Control of the starting bitrate for a specific stream > > Note this exposes some sharp points for applications to hurt > > themselves, though it may help some specific use-cases. Congestion > > control should keep them from hurting things too much. And limits could > > be applied (<50% max bitrate perhaps). > > * Control of the current bitrate for a stream (within the bounds of > > congestion control) > > * Control of the max total bitrate for all streams > > Not covered in the above. > > * Control of max bitrate for DataChannels > > Also: > > * Monitoring the current bitrates > > * What to do if the bitrate available goes below the minimum > > > > Things I'd like to see addressed in addition to the PR above: > > * Control of max total bitrate for all streams (action on the > > PeerConnection I'd presume) > > * Control of max bitrate for DataChannels (note: as a whole) (again on > > the PeerConnection I'd presume, or maybe an action on any DataChannel > > object) > > * Monitoring the current bitrates (to whatever extent it's not already > > covered in stats), particularly "instantaneous" bitrates. > > * Perhaps some event on bitrate-too-low so the app can react (drop > > video, drop capture resolution, etc) > > * Maybe min bitrate. > > Before going too deep into defining a lot of knobs, it would be really > good to get a proper definition of "bitrate". Averaged, over what time > period? Including or excluding (what) headers? Leaky bucket? > > Also, would there be any interaction between bitrate and priority, for > priority it is said > > "When there is limited bandwidth available to a PeerConnection, higher > prioirty encodings will be sent with more bandwidth, and lower priority > encodings will be sent with less bandwidth." > > Seems there could be conflicts here (e.g if a high minimum bitrate is > combined with a low priority for a stream). I had in the past understood > "priority" as only affecting the DSCP markings, and not being involved > in bitrate decisions made by the UA. > > > > > > > > -- > > Randell Jesup -- rjesup a t mozilla d o t com > > Please please please don't emailrandell-ietf@jesup.org! Way too much > spam > > > > >
Received on Friday, 21 August 2015 21:01:12 UTC