W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Suggestion made during AC review of charter

From: Erik Lagerway <elagerway@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:20:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPF_GTbRGs59ZJ0fu8+9qdz1tQQuXzP51fQ_ruRGz-jtjwnW1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
The following copy has been added under a new sub-heading 1.1.1
"Resolutions" on the wiki:
*https://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/Main_Page#Resolutions
<https://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/Main_Page#Resolutions>*

"Any resolution taken in a face-to-face meeting or teleconference is to be
considered provisional until 10 working days after the publication of the
resolution in draft minutes sent to the working groups mailing list. If no
objections are raised on the mailing list within that time, the resolution
will be considered to have consensus as a resolution of the Working Group."

/Erik



On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As part of the (still ongoing for a short while) review of our new
> charter, the suggestion was made that this group may want to facilitate
> asynchronous participation to decisions made in synchronous meeting by
> adopting the policy that other groups have adopted:
>
> [[ Any resolution taken in a face-to-face meeting or teleconference
>> is to be considered provisional until 10 working days after the
>> publication of the resolution in draft minutes sent to the working
>> groups mailing list. If no objections are raised on the mailing list
>> within that time, the resolution will be considered to have consensus
>> as a resolution of the Working Group. ]]
>>
>
> Such a policy has been added to a number of WG charters:
>   http://www.w3.org/2014/06/webapps-charter.html#decisions
>   http://www.w3.org/2015/06/webperf#decisions
>
> https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/admin/webappsec-charter-2015.html#decisions
>   http://www.w3.org/2014/secondscreen/charter.html#decisions
>
> Because I'm reluctant to bring non-absolutely required changes to the
> charter at this point, I'll likely recommend to the Director we abstain
> from adding it to ours this time around; but I'm submitting it to the group
> who might choose to adopt as its own nevertheless, independently of its
> charter. I'll leave it to the chairs to determine if and how that policy
> should be adopted.
>
> Dom
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:20:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:45 UTC