Re: Proposed Charter Changes from Cullen Jennings (fluffy) on 2015-04-29 (public-webrtc@w3.org from April 2015)

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:38:17 +0000
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
CC: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Tim Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <03C8D974-ED12-4DCA-8F42-BDF6188703E3@cisco.com>

> On Apr 29, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't care for the new terminology. 
> 
> PeerConnection can be implemented atop the ORTC objects. Ergo, ORTC is a lower-level API. 

I'v been using the term "fine grain  API" for ORTC as it seemed less loaded with good / bad connotations but I don't really care what it's called as long as we understand it. (Using object oriented API seems to cause confusion as the WebRTC 1.0 api is also an object oriented)

Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2015 16:38:45 UTC