W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2015

Withdrawing request for position statement. Re: Agenda, April 28 WEBRTC teleconference - topic "charter"

From: Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:00:25 +0000
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
CC: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <D163FE50.12DB4%goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
Hi,

We (Ericsson) have decided and withdraw our request for a position
statement, instead making our comment during the discussion part.

Best Regards
Göran


-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Monday 27 April 2015 12:45
To: W3C WEBRTC <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Agenda, April 28 WEBRTC teleconference - topic "charter"
Resent-From: W3C WEBRTC <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Monday 27 April 2015 12:46

>Agenda for the April 28 teleconference on WebRTC chartering
>
>Intro: Dom to present
>
>* The formal reason why we need to recharter
>
>
>
>* The charter changes currently in the draft
>
>* The process for approval of charters (note: we only advise the Director)
>
>
>The draft charter that we're using as reference is here:
>
>https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-charter/tree/revision
>https://cdn.rawgit.com/w3c/webrtc-charter/revision/webrtc-charter.html
>
>
>
>Chairs present (10 min)
>
>* WHAT the charter says the WG will do
>
>* WHY it should do it
>
>* WHEN it should do it
>
>
>
>Invitation to position statements: Asking people to present
>
>* WHERE in the draft they want a change
>
>* WHAT they hope to achieve by that change
>
>* WHY they think that¹s a good idea
>
>
>
>The position statements are:
>
>  * Eric Rescorla, speaking for Mozilla
>  * Göran Eriksson, speaking for Ericsson
>
>Open discussion. People will be asked to state what specific changes or
>passages they support, can live with, or cannot tolerate, and why. (30
>min)
>Proposals for changes that were not considered/presented ahead of time
>MAY be ruled out of scope for the meeting - deep surgery without emailed
>warning is inappropriate.
>
>Resolution: Chairs attempt to distil from the discussion what we need to
>change in the charter; the goal is to have a charter that many people
>support, and that everyone can live with.
>
>-- 
>Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 13:00:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:43 UTC