W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2015

Re: ReplaceTrack and track.id (Re: ReplaceTrack - need to evaluate alternatives)

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:47:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1V5W4T_1UYsjuLbiEJS=hq3VtVWX_vDyOKONDG3NutJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

>  On 04/15/2015 11:41 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
>  There just one issue I'm not sure what to do about:  if we use MID
> instead of MSID, how do we signal the synchronization groups (ie the
> MediaStreams the MediaStreamTracks are supposed to go in).
>  That's actually the whole reason why MSID was created in the first place.

This is an important point. We were thinking about using LS groups for
this, but I think there is an important problem here - LS groups have to be
the same on both sides, so if A wants their transmitted audio and video to
be synchronized, and B doesn't, there is no way to express that.
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 16:48:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:43 UTC