W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Getting a MediaStream from a <video> element

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:08:15 +0000
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1D06581B@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
On 13/09/14 06:02, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
> On 13/09/14 03:01, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> On 09/11/2014 10:28 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>> On 11 September 2014 15:36, Stefan Håkansson LK
>>> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>>> At the DC interim Martin volunteered to draft a spec covering this case
>>>> if I remember correctly.
>>> Indeed I did.  It's not been particularly high on the priority list.
>>> Please let me know if I need to raise the priority.  Intent to
>>> implement from other browsers would make a substantial difference to
>>> how I prioritize this.
>>>
>> Since it's one of the pieces we have agreement to add to the spec, we
>> either have to abandon it or add it before we Last Call the getusermedia
>> spec.
>>
>> So I think it's pretty important.
>
> My memory is that it was going to be a separate document (allowing us to
> finalize getusermedia soon).

Well, don't rely on my memory. Digging back, the opinion of the room in 
DC was that it should be integrated 
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2014May/0290.html).

But given that quite long time has passed, and that we're trying to get 
gUM to last call, I think we should consider a separate document instead.
Received on Saturday, 13 September 2014 09:08:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:41 UTC