W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > October 2014

Re: FW: [Bug 20810] SDP inadequately defined

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:18:19 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2k7JErdJR+9D7c+LoL6ONJTvu3QUvxeKXn9=9oYH1fEXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
Cc: public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 29 Oct 2014 07:10, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
wrote:
>
> I'm not entirely thrilled about all the bugs being closed as "this is the
IETF's problem", but this one in particular is an issue. There is currently
NO chain of normative references, RFC or otherwise, which when used as a
specification results in SDP that is compatible with any SDP generated or
consumed by any WEBRTC implementation. This is a bug *with the W3C
specification* until such time as we reach the point where the normative
references are sufficient to create an interoperable implementation without
reference to third party source code.

Is this a quality of implementation issue or a api definition issue?

Isn't the next version of the spec supposed to abstract away the sdp
surface? In your opinion, does ORTC have the right api to resolve this
issue?

Silvia.

> Matthew Kaufman
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org [mailto:bugzilla@jessica.w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 11:41 AM
> To: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
> Subject: [Bug 20810] SDP inadequately defined
>
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20810
>
> Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
>
> --- Comment #3 from Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> --- Closing
as "this is the IETF's problem".
>
> Note: There is no requirement that Candidate Recommendations' normative
references have to be published as RFCs.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 22:18:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:42 UTC