Friday, 28 November 2014
Thursday, 27 November 2014
- Re: WebRTC Security Assessment
- Re: Video orientation header ext. - what is it supposed to do?
- Re: Video orientation header ext. - what is it supposed to do?
- Re: Proposal and discussion for RtpSender.getCapabilities
- Video orientation header ext. - what is it supposed to do?
- Re: Proposal and discussion for RtpSender.getCapabilities
- Re: Proposal and discussion for RtpSender.getCapabilities
Tuesday, 25 November 2014
Monday, 24 November 2014
- Re: Proposal and discussion for RtpSender.getCapabilities
- RE: Proposal and discussion for RtpSender.getCapabilities
- Re: Proposal and discussion for RtpSender.getCapabilities
- Re: webrtc-ACTION-117: Move getstats and associated idl to stats doc
Monday, 17 November 2014
- Fwd: Reminder, survey closes 16-Nove - Re: Your feedback on TPAC2014 is welcome
- Re: WebRTC Security Assessment
Sunday, 16 November 2014
Thursday, 13 November 2014
Monday, 10 November 2014
Thursday, 6 November 2014
Wednesday, 5 November 2014
- [Bug 25859] Streams that become isolated generate errors on PC
- [minutes] Oct 30-31 F2F
- Re: Why is RTCIceCandidate mutable
- [Bug 25859] Streams that become isolated generate errors on PC
- [Bug 25576] steps for createDTMFSender() are missing.
- Re: Re: Proposal for removing createDTMFSender and canInsertDTMF
- Re: Proposal for removing createDTMFSender and canInsertDTMF
- Re: Why is RTCIceCandidate mutable
- Re: Why is RTCIceCandidate mutable
- [Bug 25856] Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes isolated
- [Bug 21877] API is unable to handle inbound streams prior to arrival of answer
- [Bug 21880] Certificate management is underspecified
- [Bug 25513] WebRTC spec should explicitly specify all causes of a PeerConnection-sourced track being muted
Tuesday, 4 November 2014
- [Bug 22441] Bug in section 8.1.2 Requesting Assertions
- [Bug 22442] Bug in section 8.1.3 Verifying Assertions
- [Bug 25828] Need to add pc.canTrickle)
- [Bug 25833] change the definition of "enqueue a task" as EKR slides May 20
- [Bug 25834] close is synchronous & idempotent
- [Bug 25835] when closing, all outstanding actions are cancelled and their callbacks are fired with a "cancelled" error
- [Bug 25856] Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes isolated
- [Bug 26644] MID in Candidate event attributes
- Why is RTCIceCandidate mutable
- [Bug 27214] ICE gathering state change should surface an event
- Re: [Bug 25836] add note about addtrack being async
- Re: Proposal for removing createDTMFSender and canInsertDTMF
- [Bug 25497] RTCRtpSender / Receiver objects need to be added to the specification
- [Bug 27213] DTMFSender should hang off RTCRTPSender, not MediaStreamTrack
- Re: [Bug 25836] add note about addtrack being async
- [Bug 25836] add note about addtrack being async
- [Bug 25836] add note about addtrack being async
- Re: Proposal for removing createDTMFSender and canInsertDTMF
- queue a task
- Re: Proposal for SctpTransport
- Re: Proposal for RtpSender.rtcpTransport
- Re: Proposal for SctpTransport
- Re: Proposal for removing createDTMFSender and canInsertDTMF
- Re: Proposal for RtpSender.rtcpTransport
- Re: Proposal for RtpSender.rtcpTransport
- Re: Proposal for removing createDTMFSender and canInsertDTMF
Monday, 3 November 2014
- [Bug 27227] New feature: Track swapping
- [Bug 27224] Transport objects should be added to the specification
- [Bug 25497] RTCRtpSender / Receiver objects need to be added to the specification
- [Bug 21879] Unable to access certificate information in the API
- Re: Proposal for removing createDTMFSender and canInsertDTMF
- [Bug 27227] New: New feature: Track swapping
- Re: Proposal for SctpTransport
- Re: Proposal for RtpSender.getParameters and .setParameters
- [Bug 25497] RTCRtpSender / Receiver objects need to be added to the specification
- [Bug 27226] Codec capabilities need to be accessible on an RTPSender
- [Bug 27226] Codec capabilities need to be accessible on an RTPSender
- [Bug 27226] New: Codec capabilities need to be accessible on an RTPSender
- Re: Proposal and discussion for RtpSender.getCapabilities
- Re: Proposal for RtpSender.rtcpTransport
- Proposal for removing createDTMFSender and canInsertDTMF
- Proposal for SctpTransport
- Proposal for RtpSender.getParameters and .setParameters
- Proposal and discussion for RtpSender.getCapabilities
- Proposal for RtpSender.rtcpTransport
- [Bug 25497] RTCRtpSender / Receiver objects need to be added to the specification
- [Bug 27225] Encoding Parameters need to be added to RTPSender object
- [Bug 27225] New: Encoding Parameters need to be added to RTPSender object
- [Bug 25497] RTCRtpSender / Receiver objects need to be added to the specification
- [Bug 27224] Transport objects should be added to the specification
- [Bug 27224] New: Transport objects should be added to the specification
- [Bug 25497] RTCRtpSender / Receiver objects need to be added to the specification