- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:35:54 +0100
- To: "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>
- CC: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2014-03-04 10:32, piranna@gmail.com wrote: > > I think that would work, except the part where all references > disappear. :) You can have a lot of references to closed channels. > > > I agree, but I think it would be the spected behaviour, isn't it? Why do > you see a problem to have references to closed channels? This can also > happen with the current spec... I don't. It's perfectly normal. That's what I wrote as well. The thing I was opposing was references disappearing. I think we're on the same page. /Adam
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2014 09:36:18 UTC