Re: Improvements suggestion for DataChannels

On 2014-03-04 10:32, wrote:
>  > I think that would work, except the part where all references
> disappear. :) You can have a lot of references to closed channels.
>  >
> I agree, but I think it would be the spected behaviour, isn't it? Why do
> you see a problem to have references to closed channels? This can also
> happen with the current spec...

I don't. It's perfectly normal. That's what I wrote as well. The thing I 
was opposing was references disappearing.

I think we're on the same page.


Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2014 09:36:18 UTC