W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Proposal: Fire a toneDiscarded event while discarding the invalid DTMF values.

From: tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:30:45 +0100
Cc: "kiran.guduru@samsung.com" <kiran.guduru@samsung.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, Stefan H?kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D56D0D5D-387A-4803-8CF7-8FDA6BB548E5@westhawk.co.uk>
To: "Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)" <Raju.Makaraju@alcatel-lucent.com>

On 13 Jun 2014, at 14:14, Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju) <Raju.Makaraju@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

>> It may be good to add support for "p", "w" in webrtc, so that it will be compatible with >RFC 3601
>>       pause = "p"
>>       tonewait = "w"
> [Raju] We should leave out the "w" as it is implementation dependent (what "tone"?) and un-necessarily complicates webrtc with very little gain. As I mentioned earlier use of comma for 'p' is almost universal now.

Why not use a javascript interval ? http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/met_win_setinterval.asp 

This continuous, needless adding of special case telephony centric APIs is exactly what is holding webRTC back.
Web developers now think that it is only for implementing clones of a telephone, so it isnít for them. 

T.

> 
> BR
> Raju
> 
>  
>  
> 
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 13:31:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:41 UTC