I also note that a different name for "complete" might address some of the concerns around having a transition back to "pooled" or whatever that state is called. On 9 June 2014 11:22, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9 June 2014 10:16, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: >> The emerging consensus seems to be for #3, and I also find this to be the >> easiest-to-understand solution. >> >> Barring any dissenting opinions, I will update JSEP accordingly soon. > > > Just for my gratification, is there a reason we can't have it > dependent on the ICE restart and have it dependent on the next setLD? > After all, most of those candidates will be rendered invalid at the > next restart.Received on Monday, 9 June 2014 18:23:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:59 UTC