- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:04:54 +0200
- To: kiran.guduru@samsung.com, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5395A2E6.1060203@alvestrand.no>
On 06/09/2014 01:57 PM, Kiran Kumar Guduru wrote: > Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle > > Hi, > > Please find my comments inline. > > ------- *Original Message* ------- > > *Sender* : Harald Alvestrand<harald@alvestrand.no> > > *Date* : Jun 09, 2014 20:24 (GMT+09:00) > > *Title* : Re: [Bug 25977] DTMFSender should have an onerror event handler > > For background - the DTMFSender, when we designed it, was thought to > be a feature that added value in some specific places (there were use > cases that required it), but the design should be the minimal one that > addressed those use cases. > > On 06/09/2014 11:27 AM, Kiran Kumar Guduru wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Before proposing the onError, I thought that following usecases >> requires it. >> >> 1. To throw a state error when the RTCPeerConnection is closed while >> the DTMF is being played. (some how I missed to add this in bugzilla) >> > why? > When the connection is closed, anyone interested in seeing if the > connection closes will get a notification anyway. > When the connection is closed, due to the async nature of networks, > you don't know what the last DTMF tone to reach the destination was > anyway. > > [Kiran] In interim meeting while presenting the Error Handling slides, > some discussion happened on peerConnection enqueued methods like, when > peerConnection is closed all the methods that are enqueued to process > should be cancelled with 'cancelled error'. > > Also in case of DataChannel and DTMF, DataChannel has states to > identify the closed state of connection. DTMFSender has no states. > > So, I thought that a similar behavior seems to be good in case of DTMF > too. > The queued operation discussion was about the situation where one had a callback that was due to be called - we wanted it to be called in order to preserve the "sooner or later either success or failure is called" semantic. insertDTMF doesn't have that type of callback - instead, it has an event handler. WRT state, the RTCDTMFSender is really an adjunct to its associated MediaStreamTrack. It should have as little individual state as possible; if you want to know where the signal goes, follow the track attribute.
Received on Monday, 9 June 2014 12:05:27 UTC