W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Min DTMF Gap

From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:54:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtYMjuSWJhEnatJXSSKhwXq1U4TrY+3hwzuCPk84=FBPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, Mike Johns <m.johns@commsalliance.com.au>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Gunnar Hellstrom <
gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> wrote:

>  If you see a need for settings, I do not mind having that possibility.
> The 40 ms minimum is for detection at the receiving end, so it would be
> logical to set the possible transmission timing minimum slightly higher.

Would 41 ms work? On the more serious note any DTMF duration would be
correctly detected in the system where RFC 4733 is used so setting minimum
tone to 40 ms should be allowed (and useful for some scenarios)
Roman Shpount
Received on Sunday, 19 January 2014 18:54:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC