- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:59:59 +0100
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Cc: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Alexey Aylarov <alexey@zingaya.com>, Tim Panton new <thp@westhawk.co.uk>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I'm not saying that W3C should publish a library to other to use, I'm just answering to their question regarding if there's interest for a WebRTC library to use outside browsers in so called "native" applications, that definitelly there is. 2014/1/17 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>: > 2014/1/17 piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>: >> As far as I know, yes, there's a lot of interest on using WebRTC >> server-side and for native (non-browser) applications, so a native API >> & bindings are being necesary. I know personally three companies (my >> employer is one of them) having difficulties to work with native >> WebRTC APIs, and from a personal perspectice, I'm interested on it so >> I can be able to develop in-browser and server-side head-less WebRTC >> applications using the same base code. > > There is also lot of interest in SIP and XMPP protocols and nobody > expect to have a "unique code base for building SIP or XMPP > devices/applications". Really, consider what you are proposing. > > If you want, start a project called > "the-best-and-unique-webrtc-stack-written-in-my-favourite-language" > and put it in Github with MIT license, but don't ask for such an > aberration in W3C or IETF groups. > > I strongly propose to immediately stop this no-sense subject. > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <ibc@aliax.net> -- "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo Unix." – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
Received on Friday, 17 January 2014 17:00:47 UTC