W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Update of Doohickey/AddTrack proposal

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:13:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWKE2tMKB17orpCjJVJw1O76+D3dwqJnoozgpqKucbLEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 13 February 2014 11:49, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> pc.AddTrack(track1)
> (causes track1 to be sent without a stream)
> pc.AddStreamID(stream1)
> (causes nothing to happen - stream1 is empty)
> stream1.AddTrack(track1)
> (should this cause signalling that track1 is now a member of stream1?)

That's a perverse case that I'd probably leave to the emergent
properties of the system that we build and describe.  In this case, I
don't think that it makes sense for the pc to do anything in response
to this last addTrack() call.
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 20:13:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:38 UTC