Re: Update of Doohickey/AddTrack proposal

On 13 February 2014 11:49, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> pc.AddTrack(track1)
> (causes track1 to be sent without a stream)
> pc.AddStreamID(stream1)
> (causes nothing to happen - stream1 is empty)
> stream1.AddTrack(track1)
> (should this cause signalling that track1 is now a member of stream1?)

That's a perverse case that I'd probably leave to the emergent
properties of the system that we build and describe.  In this case, I
don't think that it makes sense for the pc to do anything in response
to this last addTrack() call.