W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > February 2014

Re: New version of constrainable section of getusermedia

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 16:18:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3rF=PKD9e8BfbzLWu25BztMwNnDJ4cXLo-=PKW48vMwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Cc: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
That's not my understanding. IIRC Adam went through and found no part of
http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html spec that needed
constraints.


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
<fluffy@cisco.com>wrote:

>
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm a little confused why we're discussing Constrainable in
> public-webrtc, since I believe we've extricated Constrainable from
> http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html
>
> Uh - webrtc is going to use the Constrainable interface - we just moved
> the definition of it to GUM and until we get the basic interface sorted out
> there has not been a lot of energy into sorting out all the parts of the
> spec that would use the interface.
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 00:19:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:38 UTC