W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > February 2014

Re: New version of constrainable section of getusermedia

From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:35:00 -0500
Message-ID: <52F00B84.8050106@gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
CC: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Image capture and recording are two candidates, but we haven't gone 
through them in enough detail to know which of their properties are good 
candidates for Constrainable.  It might be a worth while exercise.  (In 
the case of Recording, we haven't settled the question of whether the 
recording has properties separate from those of the underlying Tracks.)

- Jim
On 2/3/2014 4:32 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
> Is there another scenario where we think constraints is a good fit 
> other than gUM/MediaStreamTrack?
> If not, it seems hard to know whether the Constrainable interface is 
> sufficiently general.

Jim Barnett
Received on Monday, 3 February 2014 21:35:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:38 UTC