W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal

From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:08:39 -0400
Message-ID: <536014D7.80109@mozilla.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 4/28/14 11:58 AM, Justin Uberti wrote:
> You get a RTCRtpSender as a return value from AddTrack (which replaces 
> AddStream). You get a RTCRtpReceiver as an argument to the new 
> onaddtrack callback (which replaces onaddstream). The actual track 
> object can be obtained as a property from the RTCRtpReceiver (see below).

So dumb question #1...

Why allow both cloning of tracks and adding them to multiple 

If we limited a track to one sink then couldn't these controls go on the 
track itself?

.: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 21:09:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:38 UTC