W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:48:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXuB5icV4+nDg5DeioKsipJyvFMEzJgN1zhjcOiV084Tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 28 April 2014 23:11, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> The issue could still exist if you do addTrack(T, S) and then later
> S.removeStream(T). We might prefer taking the stream directly for
> syntactical reasons, but I don't think it avoids the core issue.

That's fine; the stream configuration on the receiving end always lags
the configuration at the sending end.  I'm just not convinced that we
need a way to specify identifiers in this way, Harald's speculation on
rehydration notwithstanding.
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 16:49:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:38 UTC