W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:19:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUAVwbT2pqcRPg61vEYVW+LJEL6p3S2-OvT9LJgwrKktQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 28 April 2014 16:51, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> I thought about it a bit, and I don't really see an issue with making it
> arbitrary. This will put the track to be in the specified MS at the other
> side, but I don't see a need to force the tracks to be bagged up on the send
> side.

Why not just put the stream in, not its identifier and avoid the issue?

As for the null case, generate a new stream on the remote side for
every track that is added that way.
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 02:19:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:38 UTC