- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 13:03:29 +0000
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15861 --- Comment #9 from Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> --- (In reply to comment #7) > The general mechanism you describe here is pretty much how our current > constraint approach work (as far as I understand it). One difference I note is the existence of mandatory constraints in the spec. In my proposal, all constraints are optional and the application decides what to do when a constraint cannot be honored. Another thing I wanted to clarify, when given conflicting constraints (resolution, frame-rate, bitrate) does the browser get to decide which gets priority over the other or does it fail-fast and notify the callback immediately that the constraints cannot be honored as-is? In my proposal, the latter occurs. I'm trying to push as much of the decision-making out of the browser and into the application's hand. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 13:03:37 UTC