W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2013

Re: [MMUSIC] Should we put the SCTP max message size in the SDP?

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:15:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV22b87HKfY67P5WuRqNLOkxrYPZ7jEfjHYmnPY0ihRaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 25 November 2013 16:12, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> I agree with Eric's suggestions, including '0' as a special case.
> Regarding naming, I kind of prefer "max-", as there is ample precedent for
> this, e.g. maxptime, maxplaybackrate in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-spittka-payload-rtp-opus-03. In fact, for
> optimal consistency I would argue for |maxmsgsize|.
> Regarding how the parameter is specified, I beg you not to use positional
> arguments, and use fmtp named arguments instead, e.g.
> a=sctpmap:5000 webrtc-datachannel
> a=fmtp:5000 maxmsgsize=65536

I like it.
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 00:16:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:52 UTC