Re: addIceCandidate behavior from Martin Thomson on 2013-11-01 (public-webrtc@w3.org from November 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:04:36 -0700
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXB-FK2iGAMdWxMKBu++BHbJe2pmMkqBtDyNfYfjNdnhQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 31 October 2013 22:37, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> Perhaps the description (and the throw) is better applied to
> RTCIceCandidate's constructor, so that an RTCIceCandidate is always known to
> be syntactically valid?

I'm happy to generate a regex for folks if they are concerned about
implementing a validity check in the constructor.

See: https://github.com/martinthomson/abnf2regex

Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 17:05:04 UTC