Re: Is onsignalingstatechange synchronous? from Martin Thomson on 2013-05-14 (public-webrtc@w3.org from May 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:39:03 -0700
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWtvWdaCCf3od-KvbFnETNferJAO8VD8Cp7En_v9fYqZA@mail.gmail.com>

On 14 May 2013 10:30, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> On 5/14/13 12:20, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>
>> On 14 May 2013 07:33, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> FWIW, I my vote is that the state change at the time that the callback
>>> fires.
>>
>> I agree, but you could be more precise.  A state change should happen
>> when the actions associated with set(Local|Remote)Description are
>> complete.
>
> And successful.

I'm not sure, but I think that state transitions might be unavoidable
as a result of certain failures.

Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 18:39:30 UTC