Re: Is onsignalingstatechange synchronous? from Martin Thomson on 2013-05-14 (public-webrtc@w3.org from May 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:20:58 -0700
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWBQVZ61nmc5jeC-cajTquOekT3qeeG4s54TFg7Nbik5A@mail.gmail.com>

On 14 May 2013 07:33, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I my vote is that the state change at the time that the callback
> fires.

I agree, but you could be more precise.  A state change should happen
when the actions associated with set(Local|Remote)Description are
complete.  The state change should cause the callback to be enqueued.

Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 17:21:29 UTC