Re: RTCDataChannel.binaryType

On 05/05/2013 09:51 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> On 05/04/2013 10:24 PM, Ms2ger wrote:
>>> RTCDataChannel.binaryType should be an enum type.
>> This is a piece of spec that was inherited from the websockets spec.
>> Whenever possible, we stay compatible with websockets; is there any
>> great value in departing from it on this point?
> Note <>.
To wit:

enumBinaryType  { "blob","arraybuffer" };

Excellent - they fixed it (April 23 2013 version - seems to have been 
introduced in Aug 2012).

I was looking at the published 20 Sep 2012 version (CR), which is the 
"latest published version" (and which we link to). Dom - do you have 
advice on how we should link to these "dynamic" specs?


Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 07:49:54 UTC