- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:27:01 +0100
- To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- CC: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 03/26/2013 10:15 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > On 03/26/2013 09:00 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: >> Stephen Farrell wrote: >>> Are there other things on the user's device that might >>> end up being shared? E.g. accelerometers or other sensors. >>> There have been papers demonstrating that access to such >>> information can reveal lots of things, e.g. passwords. >> You mean like <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681562>? > Yep. Are the use-cases in webrtc for that kind of sensor > data to be made available over the n/w or is it all handled > locally? I think the DAP WG in the W3C is the right place to address APIs for sensor data. They're one of the parent WGs of the Media Capture Task Force, which is charged with getting the specs right for getusermedia, so one would assume they're aware of the discussions there. But in my opinion, neither the WEBRTC WG nor the RTCWEB WG have this in their charters. I advocate separation of concerns; if people want to work on this, go there. > > Ta, > S. > >> _______________________________________________ >> rtcweb mailing list >> rtcweb@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >> >> > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 22:27:31 UTC