- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:31:31 +0200
- To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
- CC: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 2013-06-13 18:56, Randell Jesup wrote: > On 6/5/2013 4:59 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >> On 2013-06-04 16:34, Randell Jesup wrote: >>> >>> One issue: In RTCDataChannelInit: >>> >>> boolean negotiated >>> <http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#widl-RTCDataChannelInit-negotiated> >>> =true; >>> >>> The default should be false - it should be set to true on any >>> externally-negotiated channel. >> >> Oh, I interpreted preNegotiated (skipped the "pre" -> negotiated) as a >> property on the channel that makes the user agent negotiate the >> channel for you in-band. I.e., it's pre-negotiated (or just >> negotiated) meaning that you (the developer) doesn't have to worry >> about negotiation; the opposite of "externally-negotiated". >> >> Should we use externallyNegotiated (default false) instead? That makes >> sense on both sides. > > I pushed the naming change into FF 22 Beta 4 at the last second (write, > review, land, approve to uplift, land in one day). I can't > realistically get any further non-major-failure fixes in for FF22, where > we'll be exposing this by default. Unless there's a driving reason, I'd > like to avoid in-the-field changes where possible, though they are > doable (but that would mean people trying to use this would need to do > "negotiated: true, externally-negotiated: true" for as long as they > wanted to support FF22). > > I'm ok with the name and description, so long as the default changes to > 'false', which is what I implemented and landed. We should just comment > in the IDL file that this should be set to true if the application is > using external negotiation. I believe Peter Thatcher was also assuming > the default would be false. > So I interpret what you're saying as that "negotiated" will be released in firefox, but with the opposite meaning from spec is saying currently (spec says "negotiated" != "externally negotiated"). I'm bit confused since you say that you're ok with the name and description. /Adam
Received on Friday, 14 June 2013 06:31:56 UTC