public-webrtc@w3.org from June 2013 by date

Saturday, 29 June 2013

• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers Robin Raymond
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers cowwoc
• Re: API design Adam Roach
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers Robin Raymond
• Re: API design Roman Shpount

Friday, 28 June 2013

• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers Roman Shpount
• Re: API design Adam Roach
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers piranna@gmail.com
• Re: API design Roman Shpount
• Re: API design piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers Roman Shpount
• Re: API design cowwoc
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers Roman Shpount
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers Ted Hardie
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers cowwoc
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers Roman Shpount
• Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers piranna@gmail.com
• Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers Roman Shpount
• Re: Recap from WebRTC World Adam Bergkvist

Thursday, 27 June 2013

• Re: Recap from WebRTC World Alexandre GOUAILLARD
• Re: API design Gili
• Re: API design Gili
• Re: API design piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Mandatory vs optional codecs Gili
• API design Gili
• Re: Mandatory vs optional codecs Ken Smith
• Re: Mandatory vs optional codecs Gili
• Re: Mandatory vs optional codecs Gili
• Re: Mandatory vs optional codecs Alexey Aylarov
• Mandatory vs optional codecs Gili
• Re: Recap from WebRTC World Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Recap from WebRTC World Robin Raymond
• Re: Recap from WebRTC World Ken Smith
• Recap from WebRTC World Gili
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

• RE: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Jim Barnett
• Re: Is DataChannel label unique? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Is DataChannel label unique? Adam Bergkvist

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

• Re: Is DataChannel label unique? Max Jonas Werner

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Gili

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

• Re: Is DataChannel label unique? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• [Bug 22442] New: Bug in section 8.1.3 Verifying Assertions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22441] New: Bug in section 8.1.2 Requesting Assertions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 24 June 2013

• Re: Simultaneous Peer Connections piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Simultaneous Peer Connections cowwoc
• Re: Simultaneous Peer Connections piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Simultaneous Peer Connections Adam Roach
• Re: Simultaneous Peer Connections cowwoc
• Re: Simultaneous Peer Connections Adam Roach
• RE: Simultaneous Peer Connections Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
• Re: Simultaneous Peer Connections Dan Ristic
• Re: Simultaneous Peer Connections cowwoc
• Simultaneous Peer Connections Dan Ristic
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. cowwoc
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• RE: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Jim Barnett
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist

Sunday, 23 June 2013

• Is DataChannel label unique? piranna@gmail.com

Friday, 21 June 2013

• [Bug 20819] no priority API bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20819] no priority API bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 20 June 2013

• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism Martin Thomson
• Fwd: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism piranna@gmail.com
• RE: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism Martin Thomson
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Roman Shpount
• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism cowwoc
• RE: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism cowwoc
• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism cowwoc
• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism Roman Shpount
• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Harald Alvestrand
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Roman Shpount
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Harald Alvestrand
• RE: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Jim Barnett
• [Bug 20820] congestion control of data and audio/video bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• CfC: publish FPWD of "MediaStream Image Capture"; deadline June 30 Stefan Håkansson LK

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism cowwoc
• Re: Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Alternative to the offer/answer mechanism cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• VS: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Christer Holmberg
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Roman Shpount
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Roman Shpount
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Roman Shpount
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Roman Shpount
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• [Bug 20820] congestion control of data and audio/video bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20819] no priority API bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Frédéric Luart
• RE: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• RE: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Frédéric Luart
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Silvia Pfeiffer

Tuesday, 18 June 2013

• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• RE: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Frédéric Luart
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Eric Rescorla
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist

Monday, 17 June 2013

• Re: quibble on terminology Iñaki Baz Castillo
• quibble on terminology Jim Barnett
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: How to know if a given track or media stream is being transmitted José Luis Millán
• RE: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Frédéric Luart
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Adam Bergkvist
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? tim panton
• Re: How to know if a given track or media stream is being transmitted Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Audio and Opus configurability for speed and quality (at the expense of bandwidth) lonce
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Ken Smith

Sunday, 16 June 2013

• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• RE: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Jim Barnett
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com

Saturday, 15 June 2013

• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Ken Smith
• Re: Conclusion of RTCIceServer multiple-URI thread Justin Uberti
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Martin Thomson
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc
• RE: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
• Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? cowwoc

Friday, 14 June 2013

• SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: How to know if a given track or media stream is being transmitted Iñaki Baz Castillo
• How to know if a given track or media stream is being transmitted José Luis Millán
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Adam Bergkvist
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Randell Jesup
• Audio and Opus configurability for speed and quality (at the expense of bandwidth) lonce
• Re: Conclusion of RTCIceServer multiple-URI thread Adam Bergkvist
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Adam Bergkvist

Thursday, 13 June 2013

• Re: Conclusion of RTCIceServer multiple-URI thread Justin Uberti
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Randell Jesup
• Re: quibbles about the spec Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Conclusion of RTCIceServer multiple-URI thread Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Draft text for identity-bound streams Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Conclusion of RTCIceServer multiple-URI thread Harald Alvestrand
• [Bug 22347] New: RTCIceServer should have multiple URLs bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18485] Change DTMF API to be on PeerConnection bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20794] i want to connect p2p with html5 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Draft text for identity-bound streams Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Draft text for identity-bound streams Stefan Håkansson LK

Wednesday, 12 June 2013

• Re: Conclusion of RTCIceServer multiple-URI thread Justin Uberti
• Re: Conclusion of RTCIceServer multiple-URI thread Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Conclusion of RTCIceServer multiple-URI thread Justin Uberti
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Justin Uberti
• Re: Draft text for identity-bound streams Martin Thomson
• Re: quibbles about the spec cowwoc
• Anycast (Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: quibbles about the spec Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Draft text for identity-bound streams Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Draft text for identity-bound streams Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Signaling without a server piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Signaling without a server Cullen Jennings
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Justin Uberti

Monday, 10 June 2013

• Re: Our simple PeerConnection example with Futures/Promises Adam Bergkvist
• RE: Our simple PeerConnection example with Futures/Promises Jim Barnett
• Re: Our simple PeerConnection example with Futures/Promises Adam Bergkvist
• Re: quibbles about the spec Adam Bergkvist
• RE: Our simple PeerConnection example with Futures/Promises Jim Barnett
• Re: Our simple PeerConnection example with Futures/Promises Adam Bergkvist

Sunday, 9 June 2013

• Re: Signaling without a server Dan Ristic
• Re: Signaling without a server piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Signaling without a server piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Signaling without a server Adam Roach
• Signaling without a server piranna@gmail.com

Saturday, 8 June 2013

• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

Friday, 7 June 2013

• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Eric Rescorla
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Justin Uberti
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• RE: quibbles about the spec Jim Barnett
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Eric Rescorla
• Re: Futures in WebRTC cowwoc
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

Wednesday, 5 June 2013

• Re: Futures in WebRTC David Beckwith

Friday, 7 June 2013

• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Eric Rescorla
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Our simple PeerConnection example with Futures/Promises Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Thursday, 6 June 2013

• quibbles about the spec Jim Barnett
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Justin Uberti
• Our simple PeerConnection example with Futures/Promises Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

Wednesday, 5 June 2013

• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Adam Bergkvist
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist
• Documents in scope for Futures discussion Stefan Håkansson LK

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

• Re: Futures in WebRTC Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Keith Wansbrough
• Re: Futures in WebRTC cowwoc
• Re: Futures in WebRTC Adam Roach
• RE: Future of Futures in Chrome Jim Barnett
• Future of Futures in Chrome Justin Uberti
• Re: Futures in WebRTC cowwoc
• Re: Futures in WebRTC Eric Rescorla
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Roach
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) cowwoc
• Re: Futures in WebRTC cowwoc
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) piranna@gmail.com
• Re: Futures in WebRTC Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Adam Roach
• Re: New editor's draft (v20130603) Randell Jesup
• Re: Futures in WebRTC Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Futures in WebRTC Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Futures in WebRTC Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Adam Bergkvist

Monday, 3 June 2013

• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Justin Uberti
• Re: Futures in WebRTC cowwoc
• Re: Futures in WebRTC Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Ted Hardie
• Re: Security of cross-origin audio Martin Thomson
• Re: Security of cross-origin audio Martin Thomson
• New editor's draft (v20130603) Adam Bergkvist
• Details Futures teleconf Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Allowing RTCIceServer to contain multiple URLs Iñaki Baz Castillo

Saturday, 1 June 2013

• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. cowwoc
• Re: Operations in invalid states: Exceptions don't make sense. Justin Uberti

Last message date: Saturday, 29 June 2013 07:16:14 UTC