Re: addIceCandidate needs an error callback

On 25 January 2013 15:20, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> Sound good?

Mostly.

Except:
> If we make the callbacks optional, then this change is completely backwards
> compatible with anything using the current specification.

We did decide at the last meeting that error callbacks would be
non-optional.  Backwards compatibility for an unreleased spec that is
still undergoing breaking changes seems pretty daft to me.

Received on Saturday, 26 January 2013 01:19:31 UTC